IN
FUTURES OF THE
By Dr
COSTAS KYRITSIS
Department
of Mathematics
and
Computer Science
Software
Laboratory
of
Abstract
In this paper we discuss the risk of mark-to-market loss of positions with leverage, in futures. We make the usual assumptions of Lognormal distribution and geometric Brownian motion for the underlying as in the Black-Scholes options pricing model. With these assumptions we estimate tables of required liquidity for futures on FTSE-20 and FTSE-40 in the Athens Derivative Exchange Market, during the year 2000.
Key
words
Derivatives, Geometric Brownian Motion, Stochastic Differential Equations, Simulation, Investment, Liquidity
§1 Introduction
Since August
1999 the Athens Derivative Exchange Market (ADEX) introduced for the first time futures on the Index FTSE-20,
and soon afterwards on the Index FTSE-40. At present the average amount of
money that is traded in ADEX is 10-15 billion drachmas that is almost 3% of the
traded money in the Athens Stock Exchange Market (ASE, October 2000). The
interest is increasing with the introduction of options and stock lending.
Nevertheless the peculiarities and risks of investing to futures are not quite
clear to the present average investor. For example it is highly risky and not
advisable to leave investment positions of futures that have loss till the
market has reverse trend and they became profitable, as is done with
securities. There is the risk of running out of the budget and eventually
closing the position before it becomes profitable. In this paper we analyze the
source of this risk and we estimate the required amount of money that should be
kept in cash, for probable losses.
§2 Leverage in positions on futures
When investing in positions on futures we do
not pay all the money of the investment.
Instead it is calculated daily the profit or
loss of the investment position (called mark-to-market) and is paid by
the investors and Broker Companies to appropriate clearance bank (Alpha Credit
Bank). In addition it is paid a percentage only of the height of the position,
as much as it is considered it is risked for 1-2 days for ADEX to close the
position if anything goes wrong (default position). The percentage is estimated
according to the volatility (standard deviation) of the daily percentage
changes of the underlying Index and is called Margin . This percentage
at present is 12% for futures on the Index FTSE-20 and 16% for futures on the
Index FTSE-40. This makes an advantage for the investor as he must only pay
12%-16% of the height of a position when he opens it. This is called the leverage
of the position and is a multiplier of
1/12%=8.33 times and 1/16%=6.25 times respectively. Of course not only
the rate of return is multiplied with this numbers but also the Beta (or
Elasticity) of the position. The advantage of leverage has also its risks , as
the profit or loss is paid daily on 100% of the height of the position and in a
reverse trend of the market can easily lead to bankruptcy, something not really
possible with investment positions in securities.
§3 Volatility of the price of the underlying .
In order to estimate the required Liquidity we need a forecasting of the underlying Index for the investment horizon, and the correlation and coupling of the future with the underlying Index .
The most difficult parameter is that of the Market, in other words the forecasting of the Index. This obviously depends on the season and the particular trend of the market at the Investment time.
We shall go around this difficulty in a way
that is standard in the pricing of Derivatives and is also used by ADEX in the
estimation of the percentages of 12% and 16% for the margin. We shall assume a neutral market,
neither growing neither decaying, but with a trend equal to the risk free rate
(5.59% in a year base, at present October 2000). So the model of the underlying
index is, as in the Black-Scholes option pricing model ,a Geometric Brownian
Motion (continuous time random compound interest) of normally distributed rate
r and volatility ó.
.For the definition of the stochastic differential equations and the geometric
Brownian motion see Oksental p121 Chpt. V p 60 ,exerc.7.9 ,p 121,example 5.1 p
60
The stochastic differential equation of Brownian motion (Ito interpretation) is:
(1)
The exact interpretation of the symbols
requires the concepts and definitions of stochastic Integrals and is outside
the scope of this paper. For the definitions see Oksental 1995.
The distribution of the prices Xt
is Lognormal.
The solution of this stochastic
differential equation is given by the formula:
(2)
where Bt is a Brownian Motion
The logarithm of this process Xt/ X0 is an ordinary Brownian motion with
drift:
log(Xt/ X0)=(r-(1/2) s2)t + s Bt . (3)
The average time T that it reaches X for the
first time starting from x0
Is T=log(X/ x0)/(r-(1/2) s2) (4)
If â is the beta (elasticity) of the future Yt over the index Xt
we assume that the futures also, follows
the equation
(5)
If l is the leverage of the investment the
value of the investment position on the future follwos actually the equation
(6)
The conditional variance of the Index price Xt
is calculated to have the formula
(see Karlin S-Taylor H.M.(1975) p 357)
Var(X(t)/X(0)=X0 )=X2Exp(2t(r+ó2/2))*(Exp(tó2)-1) (7)
§4 Required Liquidity tables .
For the required liquidity of position of horizon t we may take the conditional volatility (standard deviation) of the price of the future .We should not forget that these formulas assume a neutral market and the liquidity is the average and not a worse scenario.
From the above
formulae and assuming â=1 ,r=5.59% ,ó=40%
(historic volatility of 1 year) for the FTSE-20 and ó=47% for the FTSE-40 (values that are used by
ADEX at present and are estimated by the daily data) we compute the next
tables.
|
Days-FTSE-20 |
Liquidity Percentage |
Days-FTSE-20 |
Liquidity Percentage |
Days-FTSE-20 |
Liquidity Percentage |
Days-FTSE-20 |
Liquidity Percentage |
|
1 |
2.53% |
21 |
11.77% |
41 |
16.68% |
61 |
20.65% |
|
2 |
3.58% |
22 |
12.06% |
42 |
16.90% |
62 |
20.83% |
|
3 |
4.39% |
23 |
12.34% |
43 |
17.11% |
63 |
21.01% |
|
4 |
5.07% |
24 |
12.61% |
44 |
17.32% |
64 |
21.19% |
|
5 |
5.68% |
25 |
12.88% |
45 |
17.53% |
65 |
21.37% |
|
6 |
6.22% |
26 |
13.14% |
46 |
17.74% |
66 |
21.55% |
|
7 |
6.73% |
27 |
13.40% |
47 |
17.94% |
67 |
21.73% |
|
8 |
7.20% |
28 |
13.66% |
48 |
18.14% |
68 |
21.91% |
|
9 |
7.64% |
29 |
13.91% |
49 |
18.35% |
69 |
22.09% |
|
10 |
8.06% |
30 |
14.16% |
50 |
18.54% |
70 |
22.26% |
|
11 |
8.46% |
31 |
14.40% |
51 |
18.74% |
71 |
22.44% |
|
12 |
8.84% |
32 |
14.64% |
52 |
18.94% |
72 |
22.61% |
|
13 |
9.21% |
33 |
14.88% |
53 |
19.13% |
73 |
22.78% |
|
14 |
9.56% |
34 |
15.12% |
54 |
19.33% |
74 |
22.95% |
|
15 |
9.90% |
35 |
15.35% |
55 |
19.52% |
75 |
23.13% |
|
16 |
10.24% |
36 |
15.58% |
56 |
19.71% |
76 |
23.30% |
|
17 |
10.56% |
37 |
15.80% |
57 |
19.90% |
77 |
23.47% |
|
18 |
10.87% |
38 |
16.03% |
58 |
20.09% |
78 |
23.63% |
|
19 |
11.18% |
39 |
16.25% |
59 |
20.28% |
|
|
|
20 |
11.48% |
40 |
16.47% |
60 |
20.46% |
|
|
|
Days/FTSE-40 |
Liquidity Percentage |
Days/FTSE-40 |
Liquidity Percentage |
Days/FTSE-40 |
Liquidity Percentage |
Days/FTSE-40 |
Liquidity Percentage |
|
1 |
2.98% |
21 |
13.88% |
41 |
19.75% |
61 |
24.53% |
|
2 |
4.21% |
22 |
14.22% |
42 |
20.01% |
62 |
24.75% |
|
3 |
5.16% |
23 |
14.56% |
43 |
20.26% |
63 |
24.98% |
|
4 |
5.97% |
24 |
14.88% |
44 |
20.52% |
64 |
25.20% |
|
5 |
6.68% |
25 |
15.20% |
45 |
20.77% |
65 |
25.42% |
|
6 |
7.32% |
26 |
15.52% |
46 |
21.02% |
66 |
25.63% |
|
7 |
7.91% |
27 |
15.83% |
47 |
21.26% |
67 |
25.85% |
|
8 |
8.47% |
28 |
16.13% |
48 |
21.51% |
68 |
26.07% |
|
9 |
8.99% |
29 |
16.43% |
49 |
21.75% |
69 |
26.28% |
|
10 |
9.49% |
30 |
16.73% |
50 |
21.99% |
70 |
26.49% |
|
11 |
9.96% |
31 |
17.02% |
51 |
22.23% |
71 |
26.71% |
|
12 |
10.41% |
32 |
17.31% |
52 |
22.47% |
72 |
26.92% |
|
13 |
10.84% |
33 |
17.59% |
53 |
22.70% |
73 |
27.13% |
|
14 |
11.26% |
34 |
17.87% |
54 |
22.94% |
74 |
27.34% |
|
15 |
11.67% |
35 |
18.15% |
55 |
23.17% |
75 |
27.55% |
|
16 |
12.06% |
36 |
18.42% |
56 |
23.40% |
76 |
27.76% |
|
17 |
12.45% |
37 |
18.70% |
57 |
23.63% |
77 |
27.96% |
|
18 |
12.82% |
38 |
18.96% |
58 |
23.86% |
78 |
28.17% |
|
19 |
13.18% |
39 |
19.23% |
59 |
24.08% |
|
|
|
20 |
13.54% |
40 |
19.49% |
60 |
24.31% |
|
|



Bibliography
Azariadis C.(1993) Intertemporal
Macroeconomics Blackwell
Black F.Scholes M.(1976) The pricing of Options and Corporate
Liabilities Journal of Economic Theory
10 pp 239-257
Broer D.P.-Jansen W.J.(1998) Dynamic Portfolio
Adjustment and Capital
Controls: An Euler Equation Approach
Southern Economic Journal 64(4) pp
902-921 .
Gencay R.(1998) Optimization of technical
trading strategies and the profitability
in security markets.Economic Letters 59 pp249-254.
Elton E.J.-Gruber M.J. (1991) Modern portfolio
theory and investment
analysis Wiley.
Elliot,R.N. (1980) The major workd of R.N.
Elliot ,Chappaqua
(edited
by Robert Prechter) NY:New Classics Library .
Kloeden E.P.-Platen E.-Schurtz h.(1997) Numerical Solutions of SDE
Through Computer Experiments Springer
Karlin S-Taylor H.M.(1975) A first course in stochastic processes. Academic
press .
Magee J.(1992)
Technical Analysis of Stock Trends New York Institute of Finance
Mallaris A.G.-Brock W.A.(1982) Stochastic Methods in Economics and
Finance North-Holland
Merton R.C (1968) Lifetime portfolio selection
under uncertainty:The
continuous time case. Rev. Econ.Statist. II pp247-257
Mertzanis Ch.(1998) Limit of prices and
variance of the general index in the
Millionis A.E..-Moschos D.(1998) Information
Efficiency and application in
the
Murphy J.J. Technical Analysis of the Futures
Markets .New
Oksendal B (1995)
Stochastic Differential equations Springer 1995
Papadamoy S.-Papanastasiou D.-Tsopoglo (1998)
Research on the predictability
of the stocks in the Athens
Stockmarket. Proceedings of the Conference of the
Roy S.(1995)
Theory of dynamic choice for survival under uncertainty
Mathematics of social sciences 30 pp171-194
Spanoudaki J.-Kampaneloy A.-Antonogiorkakis
P.(1998) Volume indices in
the Technical analysis of
stocks.Monte-Carlo empirical results. Proceedings of the Conference of the
Samuelson P.A.(1968) Lifetime portfolio selection by
dynamic programming
Rev. Econ.Statist. II pp239-246